• Resources
    • Videos/Speeches/Articles
    • The Art of Health Freedom
    • Good Books
    • Recommended Videos
    • Recommended Links
    • Radio Show Archives
    • Trustee Interviews
    • Newsletter Archives
    • Internet Links
  • Rave Reviews
    • Testimonials
    • Video Testimonials
  • Take Action
    • Create Pushback
    • Tell Your Friends
    • Become an Organizer
    • Send Letters
  • Wellness Stores
    • Buy our products
    • Valley of the Moon Coffee
  • 5 Big Lies
    • Drugs & Vaccine
    • Chemtrails
    • G.M.O.
    • Radiation
    • Food
  • Home
  • Support
    • Support Health Freedom
    • Coffee
  • Events/Press/Media
    • POD Casts/Radio Shows
    • Webinars
    • Press Release
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • Accomplishments
    • Board of Trustees
    • NSF History/Vision
    • Contact Webmaster
    • Customer Service
  • Dr. Rima’s Blog/Vlog
    • GDS
    • Codex Alimentarius
  • eBook Download

Author Archive for Administrator – Page 178

Expose’ by Pharmaceutical Company Whistle-Blower?

By Administrator on December 17, 2007 No Comments

December 19, 2007 update: the Expose may be a hoax — or satire! Please see details at:
http://vitaminlawyerhealthfreedom.blogspot.com/2007/12/was-pharma-exec-vaccine-expose-hoax.html

—————————————————

Original posting:

The following explosive information was posted anonymously on the internet at: http://www.freewebs.com/merckflu/ and forwarded to us by a supporter.

We cannot confirm all of the shocking details and note that the factual information is not specific enough, or verifiable to indicate that a company insider wrote it. The general claims regarding the dangers of vaccination are widely believed by health and freedom advocates. We have removed any identified commercial references and replaced same with “M”. The Foundation and its trustees had no prior knowledge of this posting and were neither asked for permission to mention our URL, nor gave such permission.

———————————————

THE TRUTH ABOUT “M” FLU VACCINES

Hi!

I’m a former “M’ executive with knowledge that will get me “accidentally” killed if anybody ever discovers who I really am. So, I am lying when I tell you my name is Steve. But everything else I tell you is true!

The active ingredient in all flu vaccines manufactured by “M” is mercury. No other ingredient in any “M” flu vaccine has any effect on influenza in any way. Only mercury has any effect on the flu. What mercury does is kill nerve cells. The brain is basically nerve cells, fat and water. So is the spinal cord. So are all the ganglia in the human body. All mercury does is kill nerve cells.

It turns out, that dead nerve cells laden with mercury and nerve cells dying from mercury poisoning actually do protect the surrounding cells from viral infections. Flu is a viral infection. We discovered this property of mercury at “M” in about 1965 and started lacing all of our flu vaccines with mercury. “M” has not only the most profitable flu vaccines, they have the most effective. Why? Because they add mercury to their vaccines. Without mercury, flu vaccines are less effective than one cup of herbal tea. With mercury, the vaccine is very effective at killing nerve cells and more effective than one cup of herbal tea in preventing the flu. In fact almost as many vaccinated people get the flu as the normal population. But, with flu vaccines, there is a price to pay:

LUNG PROBLEMS

Before we started adding mercury to our flu vaccines, we had very few reports of children becoming asthmatic. I’m guessing the incidence rate was less than 30 cases per 1,000,000 vaccines. Thirty per million is less than placebo effect and it would be very difficult to ever prove the vaccine caused the asthma. Going to court when you were the 1 in 33,000 people vaccinated that developed asthma, is a losing cause. You’ll never prove it to any judge or jury. You won’t even get your case to a jury trial.

Immediately after we started adding mercury to the vaccines, the number of reports claiming children were developing asthma post vaccine increased several hundred-fold. The current odds are 13 out of every 100 children vaccinated with anything containing mercury will report asthmatic symptoms within thirty days. Once reported, these symptoms rarely remit. One out of eight children being vaccinated for flu will develop asthma, asthma-like symptoms and cystic fibrosis that remains with them for life. That’s the current odds. This would make a very good court case except for one thing. “M” is immune to lawsuits for their flu vaccines thanks to the FDA. You can’t sue “M” for any side effect of their flu vaccine – no matter how gross their negligence. Here’s a sample of what happens because they add mercury to their flu vaccines and that’s grossly negligent and should be criminal. But it isn’t.

BRAIN DAMAGE

Mercury kills nerve cells. When the nerve cells in the brain are die, the result is attention deficit, autism, behavioral disorders, bipolar, brain tumors and cancer, decreased intelligence, hyperactivity and memory problems. Flu doesn’t cause any of these things. Before mercury was added to flu vaccines all of these conditions were very rare. Autism occurred in less than one birth out of a million. Attention deficit was unknown as was Asperger Syndrome. Behavioral, obsessive-compulsive disorder, bipolar and hyperactivity disorders were extremely rare — less than one in a million, and these disorders didn’t even have a name. Today one out of three children receiving mercury-laced flu vaccines will develop one or more of these problems within twelve months of being inoculated. The incidence for children who are not inoculated is very rare in America and around the world.

“M” has known for twenty-five years or more that mercury is absolutely and irrevocably the cause of all these disorders, syndromes and conditions. Mercury is the cause because it kills the brain cells and other nerve cells that keep the nervous system running smoothly. Kill some critical cells and you create a plethora of problems medicine can’t cure. You also create a culture dependent upon you for the rest of their natural lives. “M” knows this and does nothing about it but rake in the profits. “M” stands for mercury and mercury kills your brain and nervous system and that’s what “M” does to protect you from the flu.

MUSCLE ATROPHY

But that’s only the beginning, when nerve cells die, muscles become under-nourished and atrophy and give rise to muscular dystrophy, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, and myriad syndromes plaguing people who receive flu vaccines. But the best part of this from “M”‘s viewpoint is it takes years for these syndromes to manifest and proving the vaccine did it is nearly, if not absolutely, impossible. That’s the bad news for all of us, because today these things all happen a hundred or more times often than before the introduction of mercury in flu vaccines. They also happen hundreds of times more often to adults who were vaccinated as children than to adults who were never vaccinated. One of the benefits of living in a third-world country is your children do not need to be vaccinated against the flu.

WHAT DO “M” EMPLOYEES DO?

Of twenty-five thousand plus employees during my employment, I never heard of one “M” employee who allowed themselves, their families and especially their children to be vaccinated against the flu. They know too much and they’re not taking any chances with their families. If they are ordered to vaccinate their children, they take them to one of the company doctors who inoculate their children with saline solution and sign on the dotted line the batch and lot number of the flu vaccine they used (probably by flushing it down the toilet).

Insiders protect their children.

WHAT CAN YOU DO?

Here are the possibilities as I see them: a) become a “M” employee, b) protect your children even if you have to move them out of the state or country, or c) gamble with your children’s chances of a normal life and allow them to be vaccinated. In the meantime, join and support HealthFreedomUSA.org and protect your children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. Join in all of their campaigns to Save the Children and support them as best you can.

PLEASE HELP SAVE THE CHILDREN!
“M” WON’T, YOU CAN

WHAT WILL “M” EXECUTIVES DO?

They’ll spend as much money as they need to spend to identify and locate me. They expect to eventually find and terminate me, and I expect to live. They’ll continue to lie to the FDA and the public. The public doesn’t know any better and the FDA doesn’t want to know. Anything FDA employees know will place them in jeopardy and they know that. They don’t want to know anything.

“M” executives will lie in court and to the legislature. Courts rely on the preponderance of evidence and “M” has always been able to purchase the preponderance of evidence for bottom dollar. The legislature relies on re-election and “M” can spend enough money to make that happen even if they have to buy each voter, one voter at a time.

Why? Because they continue to make more money in one day than most people can make in a year. With all that money they can do whatever they want to do and buy themselves out of anything, anytime. I know. I did. Now I feel guilty because I am partly responsible for killing and maiming children with vaccines that are not only legal, they’re required by law. That legally makes me a good guy.

That’s America! The good guys get to legally kill and maim children with complete immunity and the bad guys go to jail for stealing bread to feed their children. That’s America!

PS: Please make a copy of this web site and share it with your friends. When the good guys from “M” or the FDA find it, this site will disappear as have the two previous web sites I built with the same information. Thank you.

PLEASE HELP SAVE THE CHILDREN!

©2007

———————————————

We are not aware of who claims the copyright on the above noted posting and reproduce it based on the permission stated in the article.

Please return to the Natural Solutions Foundation main page at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org to Take Action, sign up for our eAlert email list and make a generous tax deductible donation.

Alone we are just “voices in the wilderness” — together we are powerful enough to speak truth to power – and have power listen!

Categories : Blog / Vlog, The Law & CODEX

NSF comments on FDA “AER Questions & Answers”

By Administrator on December 14, 2007 No Comments

Filed 7:15 PM – Comment Number: 215742

Natural Solutions Foundation
www.healthfreedomusa.org

December 14, 2007

To: Food and Drug Administration
Docket No. 2007D-0388

“Draft Guidance for Industry: Questions
and Answers Regarding Adverse Event
Reporting…”

We recommend that all AERs include clear indications of any and all prescription and over the counter drugs being used by the person involved. We believe that often supposed “adverse reactions” to nutrients are actually drug – nutrient interactions or nutrient depletions caused by drugs, wherein normal structure and function are changed to the detriment of the person.

The Foundation joins in Maury Silverman’s comments below, including urging that all drugs be labeled to indicate the nutrient depletions they cause, so that truthful AERs can be filed.

For the Natural Solutions Foundation
Ralph Fucetola JD, Trustee
http://vitaminlawyerhealthfreedom.blogspot.com

Mr. Silverman’s Comments

“The key dilemma to evaluate any serious adverse event reports to FDA to dietary supplement companies; is to screen out serious drug problems when there is concurrent usage & ingestion of drugs of any type, with dietary supplements & nutrients.

“The problem with this is commonly within the term: POLYPHARMACY. This means concurrent ingestion of many drugs, be they prescription, OTC, illegal, adulterated, counterfeit, and/or other. As drugs are added, concurrently, the incidence, seriousness, and danger of side effects, toxicity, untoward effects, and life-threatening illness, escalates.

“There are two Institute of Medicine reports & recommendations, of very significant relevance to this, from August & September 2006. They are titled: Preventing Medication Errors, August 2006, and The Future of Drug Safety, Sept 2006.

“As for inadequate post-market drug safety surveillance, as more recently seen in the matters of Vioxx and Avandia, the future effect and implementation of the drug safety amendments of the recent FDA ‘revitalization’, now in law as PL 110-85, remain to be seen, in the public health interest, to minimize serious adverse medical events, by proper knowledge of usage, of all of the above named products.

“First, the medical and health professions, the FDA, and the educated consumer must understand the need to prevent drug-drug interactions, so often in polypharmacy usage. This should be included in the AER questions and answers and any regulations.

“Proper prescribing of a pharmaceutical drug is best by a competent medical doctor, who can accurately match the mechanism of action of the drug, with the pathophysiology of the illness/disease being treated. Direct-to-consumer advertising often clouds and distorts proper decision-making in prescribing drugs, be they by a professional clinical scientist & practitioner; or self-prescribed.

“Next, to consider are drug-nutrient interactions:

“The pathway, pioneering treatise and work in this area was by Daphne Roe M.D. of Cornell University who published in two volumes: Drug-Induced Nutritional Deficiencies, in 1976 & 1984.

“The major biochemical & physiologically theme of Dr. Roe’s work is that drug-nutrient interactions are ACTUALLY drug problems, because DRUGS DEPLETE NUTRIENTS.
Alcohol and tobacco also do so.

“Therefore, with regard to AER’s reported to dietary supplement companies, the FDA ought to; and must require that identification of all concurrent drugs of any type be identified, along with data on dosages, and duration of dosage; in relation to the medical history, the current diagnosed pathophysiologies of the complainant; and with retrieval of all relevant medical and treatment records.

“Research needs from this compilation and complexity of data would be the cumulative effects of concurrent usage of products on the enzyme & detoxification systems of the liver, of which synthetic drugs, and environmental pollutants, are of worse impact, than any nutrients, and natural products or remedies of ecological soundness, which are presumed safe under the law.

“To honor all of the above stated concerns will facilitate, enable, and honestly make possible accurate, factual analysis of the terms; ‘causation’ and ‘association’.

“Thank you for listening,
Maury Silverman”

Categories : Blog / Vlog, The Law & CODEX

Experimentation on US Citizens. And the Beat Goes On

By Administrator on December 14, 2007 2 Comments

Here is a pretty good compendium of Government Sanctioned experimentation. What is not listed here is the fact that approved drugs are then studied by the FDA for safety in “Phase IV”, Post Market Surveillance, which makes the use of drugs the single greatest experiment ever carried out, unless, of course, you count lacing food with genetically modified components which MAY NOT be labeled because, according to the FDA, if you knew it contained the stuff, you wouldn’t eat it!

With thanks to Mike Adams of NewsTarget.

Think U.S. health authorities have never conducted outrageous medical experiments on children, women, minorities, homosexuals and inmates? Think again: This timeline, originally put together by Dani Veracity (a NewsTarget reporter), has been edited and updated with recent vaccination experimentation programs in Maryland and New Jersey. Here’s what’s really happening in the United States when it comes to exploiting the public for medical experimentation:

(1845 – 1849) J. Marion Sims, later hailed as the “father of gynecology,” performs medical experiments on enslaved African women without anesthesia. These women would usually die of infection soon after surgery. Based on his belief that the movement of newborns’ skull bones during protracted births causes trismus, he also uses a shoemaker’s awl, a pointed tool shoemakers use to make holes in leather, to practice moving the skull bones of babies born to enslaved mothers (Brinker).

(1895)
New York pediatrician Henry Heiman infects a 4-year-old boy whom he calls “an idiot with chronic epilepsy” with gonorrhea as part of a medical experiment (“Human Experimentation: Before the Nazi Era and After”).

(1896)
Dr. Arthur Wentworth turns 29 children at Boston’s Children’s Hospital into human guinea pigs when he performs spinal taps on them, just to test whether the procedure is harmful (Sharav).

(1906)
Harvard professor Dr. Richard Strong infects prisoners in the Philippines with cholera to study the disease; 13 of them die. He compensates survivors with cigars and cigarettes. During the Nuremberg Trials, Nazi doctors cite this study to justify their own medical experiments (Greger, Sharav).

(1911)
Dr. Hideyo Noguchi of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research publishes data on injecting an inactive syphilis preparation into the skin of 146 hospital patients and normal children in an attempt to develop a skin test for syphilis. Later, in 1913, several of these children’s parents sue Dr. Noguchi for allegedly infecting their children with syphilis (“Reviews and Notes: History of Medicine: Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America before the Second World War”).

(1913)
Medical experimenters “test” 15 children at the children’s home St. Vincent’s House in Philadelphia with tuberculin, resulting in permanent blindness in some of the children. Though the Pennsylvania House of Representatives records the incident, the researchers are not punished for the experiments (“Human Experimentation: Before the Nazi Era and After”).

(1915)
Dr. Joseph Goldberger, under order of the U.S. Public Health Office, produces Pellagra, a debilitating disease that affects the central nervous system, in 12 Mississippi inmates to try to find a cure for the disease. One test subject later says that he had been through “a thousand hells.” In 1935, after millions die from the disease, the director of the U.S Public Health Office would finally admit that officials had known that it was caused by a niacin deficiency for some time, but did nothing about it because it mostly affected poor African-Americans. During the Nuremberg Trials, Nazi doctors used this study to try to justify their medical experiments on concentration camp inmates (Greger; Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).

(1932)
(1932-1972) The U.S. Public Health Service in Tuskegee, Ala. diagnoses 400 poor, black sharecroppers with syphilis but never tells them of their illness nor treats them; instead researchers use the men as human guinea pigs to follow the symptoms and progression of the disease. They all eventually die from syphilis and their families are never told that they could have been treated (Goliszek, University of Virginia Health System Health Sciences Library).

(1939)
In order to test his theory on the roots of stuttering, prominent speech pathologist Dr. Wendell Johnson performs his famous “Monster Experiment” on 22 children at the Iowa Soldiers’ Orphans’ Home in Davenport. Dr. Johnson and his graduate students put the children under intense psychological pressure, causing them to switch from speaking normally to stuttering heavily. At the time, some of the students reportedly warn Dr. Johnson that, “in the aftermath of World War II, observers might draw comparisons to Nazi experiments on human subjects, which could destroy his career” (Alliance for Human Research Protection).

(1941)
Dr. William C. Black infects a 12-month-old baby with herpes as part of a medical experiment. At the time, the editor of the Journal of Experimental Medicine, Francis Payton Rous, calls it “an abuse of power, an infringement of the rights of an individual, and not excusable because the illness which followed had implications for science” (Sharav).

An article in a 1941 issue of Archives of Pediatrics describes medical studies of the severe gum disease Vincent’s angina in which doctors transmit the disease from sick children to healthy children with oral swabs (Goliszek).

Researchers give 800 poverty-stricken pregnant women at a Vanderbilt University prenatal clinic “cocktails” including radioactive iron in order to determine the iron requirements of pregnant women (Pacchioli).

(1942)
The Chemical Warfare Service begins mustard gas and lewisite experiments on 4,000 members of the U.S. military. Some test subjects don’t realize they are volunteering for chemical exposure experiments, like 17-year-old Nathan Schnurman, who in 1944 thinks he is only volunteering to test “U.S. Navy summer clothes” (Goliszek).

Merck Pharmaceuticals President George Merck is named director of the War Research Service (WRS), an agency designed to oversee the establishment of a biological warfare program (Goliszek).

(1944 – 1946) A captain in the medical corps addresses an April 1944 memo to Col. Stanford Warren, head of the Manhattan Project’s Medical Section, expressing his concerns about atom bomb component fluoride’s central nervous system (CNS) effects and asking for animal research to be done to determine the extent of these effects: “Clinical evidence suggests that uranium hexafluoride may have a rather marked central nervous system effect … It seems most likely that the F [code for fluoride] component rather than the T [code for uranium] is the causative factor … Since work with these compounds is essential, it will be necessary to know in advance what mental effects may occur after exposure.” The following year, the Manhattan Project would begin human-based studies on fluoride’s effects (Griffiths and Bryson).

The Manhattan Project medical team, led by the now infamous University of Rochester radiologist Col. Safford Warren, injects plutonium into patients at the University’s teaching hospital, Strong Memorial (Burton Report).

(1945)
Continuing the Manhattan Project, researchers inject plutonium into three patients at the University of Chicago’s Billings Hospital (Sharav).

The U.S. State Department, Army intelligence and the CIA begin Operation Paperclip, offering Nazi scientists immunity and secret identities in exchange for work on top-secret government projects on aerodynamics and chemical warfare medicine in the United States (“Project Paperclip”).

(1945 – 1955) In Newburgh, N.Y., researchers linked to the Manhattan Project begin the most extensive American study ever done on the health effects of fluoridating public drinking water (Griffiths and Bryson).

(1946)
Continuing the Newburg study of 1945, the Manhattan Project commissions the University of Rochester to study fluoride’s effects on animals and humans in a project codenamed “Program F.” With the help of the New York State Health Department, Program F researchers secretly collect and analyze blood and tissue samples from Newburg residents. The studies are sponsored by the Atomic Energy Commission and take place at the University of Rochester Medical Center’s Strong Memorial Hospital (Griffiths and Bryson).

(1946 – 1947) University of Rochester researchers inject four male and two female human test subjects with uranium-234 and uranium-235 in dosages ranging from 6.4 to 70.7 micrograms per one kilogram of body weight in order to study how much uranium they could tolerate before their kidneys become damaged (Goliszek).

Six male employees of a Chicago metallurgical laboratory are given water contaminated with plutonium-239 to drink so that researchers can learn how plutonium is absorbed into the digestive tract (Goliszek).

Researchers begin using patients in VA hospitals as test subjects for human medical experiments, cleverly worded as “investigations” or “observations” in medical study reports to avoid negative connotations and bad publicity (Sharav).

The American public finally learns of the biowarfare experiments being done at Fort Detrick from a report released by the War Department (Goliszek).

(1947)
Col. E.E. Kirkpatrick of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) issues a top-secret document (707075) dated Jan. 8. In it, he writes that “certain radioactive substances are being prepared for intravenous administration to human subjects as a part of the work of the contract” (Goliszek).

A secret AEC document dated April 17 reads, “It is desired that no document be released which refers to experiments with humans that might have an adverse reaction on public opinion or result in legal suits,” revealing that the U.S. government was aware of the health risks its nuclear tests posed to military personnel conducting the tests or nearby civilians (Goliszek).

The CIA begins studying LSD’s potential as a weapon by using military and civilian test subjects for experiments without their consent or even knowledge. Eventually, these LSD studies will evolve into the MKULTRA program in 1953 (Sharav).

(1947 – 1953) The U.S. Navy begins Project Chatter to identify and test so-called “truth serums,” such as those used by the Soviet Union to interrogate spies. Mescaline and the central nervous system depressant scopolamine are among the many drugs tested on human subjects (Goliszek).

(1948)
Based on the secret studies performed on Newburgh, N.Y. residents beginning in 1945, Project F researchers publish a report in the August 1948 edition of the Journal of the American Dental Association, detailing fluoride’s health dangers. The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) quickly censors it for “national security” reasons (Griffiths and Bryson).

(1950)
(1950 – 1953) The U.S. Army releases chemical clouds over six American and Canadian cities. Residents in Winnipeg, Canada, where a highly toxic chemical called cadmium is dropped, subsequently experience high rates of respiratory illnesses (Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).

In order to determine how susceptible an American city could be to biological attack, the U.S. Navy sprays a cloud of Bacillus globigii bacteria from ships over the San Francisco shoreline. According to monitoring devices situated throughout the city to test the extent of infection, the eight thousand residents of San Francisco inhale five thousand or more bacteria particles, many becoming sick with pneumonia-like symptoms (Goliszek).

Dr. Joseph Strokes of the University of Pennsylvania infects 200 female prisoners with viral hepatitis to study the disease (Sharav).

Doctors at the Cleveland City Hospital study changes in cerebral blood flow by injecting test subjects with spinal anesthesia, inserting needles in their jugular veins and brachial arteries, tilting their heads down and, after massive blood loss causes paralysis and fainting, measuring their blood pressure. They often perform this experiment multiple times on the same subject (Goliszek).

Dr. D. Ewen Cameron, later of MKULTRA infamy due to his 1957 to1964 experiments on Canadians, publishes an article in the British Journal of Physical Medicine, in which he describes experiments that entail forcing schizophrenic patients at Manitoba’s Brandon Mental Hospital to lie naked under 15- to 200-watt red lamps for up to eight hours per day. His other experiments include placing mental patients in an electric cage that overheats their internal body temperatures to 103 degrees Fahrenheit, and inducing comas by giving patients large injections of insulin (Goliszek).

(1951)
The U.S. Army secretly contaminates the Norfolk Naval Supply Center in Virginia and Washington, D.C.’s National Airport with a strain of bacteria chosen because African-Americans were believed to be more susceptible to it than Caucasians. The experiment causes food poisoning, respiratory problems and blood poisoning (Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).

(1951 – 1956) Under contract with the Air Force’s School of Aviation Medicine (SAM), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston begins studying the effects of radiation on cancer patients — many of them members of minority groups or indigents, according to sources — in order to determine both radiation’s ability to treat cancer and the possible long-term radiation effects of pilots flying nuclear-powered planes. The study lasts until 1956, involving 263 cancer patients. Beginning in 1953, the subjects are required to sign a waiver form, but it still does not meet the informed consent guidelines established by the Wilson memo released that year. The TBI studies themselves would continue at four different institutions — Baylor University College of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, the U.S. Naval Hospital in Bethesda and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine — until 1971 (U.S. Department of Energy, Goliszek).

American, Canadian and British military and intelligence officials gather a small group of eminent psychologists to a secret meeting at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Montreal about Communist “thought-control techniques.” They proposed a top-secret research program on behavior modification — involving testing drugs, hypnosis, electroshock and lobotomies on humans (Barker).

(1952)
At the famous Sloan-Kettering Institute, Chester M. Southam injects live cancer cells into prisoners at the Ohio State Prison to study the progression of the disease. Half of the prisoners in this National Institutes of Health-sponsored (NIH) study are black, awakening racial suspicions stemming from Tuskegee, which was also an NIH-sponsored study (Merritte, et al.).

(1953 – 1974) The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) sponsors iodine studies at the University of Iowa. In the first study, researchers give pregnant women 100 to 200 microcuries of iodine-131 and then study the women’s aborted embryos in order to learn at what stage and to what extent radioactive iodine crosses the placental barrier. In the second study, researchers give 12 male and 13 female newborns under 36 hours old and weighing between 5.5 and 8.5 pounds iodine-131 either orally or via intramuscular injection, later measuring the concentration of iodine in the newborns’ thyroid glands (Goliszek).

As part of an AEC study, researchers feed 28 healthy infants at the University of Nebraska College of Medicine iodine-131 through a gastric tube and then test concentration of iodine in the infants’ thyroid glands 24 hours later (Goliszek).

(1953 – 1957) Eleven patients at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston are injected with uranium as part of the Manhattan Project (Sharav).

In an AEC-sponsored study at the University of Tennessee, researchers inject healthy two- to three-day-old newborns with approximately 60 rads of iodine-131 (Goliszek).

Newborn Daniel Burton becomes blind when physicians at Brooklyn Doctors Hospital perform an experimental high oxygen treatment for Retrolental Fibroplasia, a retinal disorder affecting premature infants, on him and other premature babies. The physicians perform the experimental treatment despite earlier studies showing that high oxygen levels cause blindness. Testimony in Burton v. Brooklyn Doctors Hospital (452 N.Y.S.2d875) later reveals that researchers continued to give Burton and other infants excess oxygen even after their eyes had swelled to dangerous levels (Goliszek, Sharav).

A 1953 article in Clinical Science describes a medical experiment in which researchers purposely blister the abdomens of 41 children, ranging in age from eight to 14, with cantharide in order to study how severely the substance irritates the skin (Goliszek).

The AEC performs a series of field tests known as “Green Run,” dropping radiodine 131 and xenon 133 over the Hanford, Wash. site — 500,000 acres encompassing three small towns (Hanford, White Bluffs and Richland) along the Columbia River (Sharav).

In an AEC-sponsored study to learn whether radioactive iodine affects premature babies differently from full-term babies, researchers at Harper Hospital in Detroit give oral doses of iodine-131 to 65 premature and full-term infants weighing between 2.1 and 5.5 pounds (Goliszek).

(1955 – 1957) In order to learn how cold weather affects human physiology, researchers give a total of 200 doses of iodine-131, a radioactive tracer that concentrates almost immediately in the thyroid gland, to 85 healthy Eskimos and 17 Athapascan Indians living in Alaska. They study the tracer within the body by blood, thyroid tissue, urine and saliva samples from the test subjects. Due to the language barrier, no one tells the test subjects what is being done to them, so there is no informed consent (Goliszek).

(1956 – 1957) U.S. Army covert biological weapons researchers release mosquitoes infected with yellow fever and dengue fever over Savannah, Ga., and Avon Park, Fla., to test the insects’ ability to carry disease. After each test, Army agents pose as public health officials to test victims for effects and take pictures of the unwitting test subjects. These experiments result in a high incidence of fevers, respiratory distress, stillbirths, encephalitis and typhoid among the two cities’ residents, as well as several deaths (Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).

(1957)
The U.S. military conducts Operation Plumbbob at the Nevada Test Site, 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas. Operation Pumbbob consists of 29 nuclear detonations, eventually creating radiation expected to result in a total 32,000 cases of thyroid cancer among civilians in the area. Around 18,000 members of the U.S. military participate in Operation Pumbbob’s Desert Rock VII and VIII, which are designed to see how the average foot soldier physiologically and mentally responds to a nuclear battlefield (“Operation Plumbbob”, Goliszek).

(1957 – 1964) As part of MKULTRA, the CIA pays McGill University Department of Psychiatry founder Dr. D. Ewen Cameron $69,000 to perform LSD studies and potentially lethal experiments on Canadians being treated for minor disorders like post-partum depression and anxiety at the Allan Memorial Institute, which houses the Psychiatry Department of the Royal Victoria Hospital in Montreal. The CIA encourages Dr. Cameron to fully explore his “psychic driving” concept of correcting madness through completely erasing one’s memory and rewriting the psyche. These “driving” experiments involve putting human test subjects into drug-, electroshock- and sensory deprivation-induced vegetative states for up to three months, and then playing tape loops of noise or simple repetitive statements for weeks or months in order to “rewrite” the “erased” psyche. Dr. Cameron also gives human test subjects paralytic drugs and electroconvulsive therapy 30 to 40 times, as part of his experiments. Most of Dr. Cameron’s test subjects suffer permanent damage as a result of his work (Goliszek, “Donald Ewan Cameron”).

In order to study how blood flows through children’s brains, researchers at Children’s Hospital in Philadelphia perform the following experiment on healthy children, ranging in age from three to 11: They insert needles into each child’s femoral artery (thigh) and jugular vein (neck), bringing the blood down from the brain. Then, they force each child to inhale a special gas through a facemask. In their subsequent Journal of Clinical Investigation article on this study, the researchers note that, in order to perform the experiment, they had to restrain some of the child test subjects by bandaging them to boards (Goliszek).

(1958)
The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) drops radioactive materials over Point Hope, Alaska, home to the Inupiats, in a field test known under the codename “Project Chariot” (Sharav).

(1961)
In response to the Nuremberg Trials, Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram begins his famous Obedience to Authority Study in order to answer his question “Could it be that (Adolf) Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?” Male test subjects, ranging in age from 20 to 40 and coming from all education backgrounds, are told to give “learners” electric shocks for every wrong answer the learners give in response to word pair questions. In reality, the learners are actors and are not receiving electric shocks, but what matters is that the test subjects do not know that. Astoundingly, they keep on following orders and continue to administer increasingly high levels of “shocks,” even after the actor learners show obvious physical pain (“Milgram Experiment”).

(1962)
Researchers at the Laurel Children’s Center in Maryland test experimental acne antibiotics on children and continue their tests even after half of the young test subjects develop severe liver damage because of the experimental medication (Goliszek).

The FDA begins requiring that a new pharmaceutical undergo three human clinical trials before it will approve it. From 1962 to 1980, pharmaceutical companies satisfy this requirement by running Phase I trials, which determine a drug’s toxicity, on prison inmates, giving them small amounts of cash for compensation (Sharav).

(1963)
Chester M. Southam, who injected Ohio State Prison inmates with live cancer cells in 1952, performs the same procedure on 22 senile, African-American female patients at the Brooklyn Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital in order to watch their immunological response. Southam tells the patients that they are receiving “some cells,” but leaves out the fact that they are cancer cells. He claims he doesn’t obtain informed consent from the patients because he does not want to frighten them by telling them what he is doing, but he nevertheless temporarily loses his medical license because of it. Ironically, he eventually becomes president of the American Cancer Society (Greger, Merritte, et al.).

Researchers at the University of Washington directly irradiate the testes of 232 prison inmates in order to determine radiation’s effects on testicular function. When these inmates later leave prison and have children, at least four have babies born with birth defects. The exact number is unknown because researchers never follow up on the men to see the long-term effects of their experiment (Goliszek).

(1963 – 1966) New York University researcher Saul Krugman promises parents with mentally disabled children definite enrollment into the Willowbrook State School in Staten Island, N.Y., a resident mental institution for mentally retarded children, in exchange for their signatures on a consent form for procedures presented as “vaccinations.” In reality, the procedures involve deliberately infecting children with viral hepatitis by feeding them an extract made from the feces of infected patients, so that Krugman can study the course of viral hepatitis as well the effectiveness of a hepatitis vaccine (Hammer Breslow).

(1963 – 1971) Leading endocrinologist Dr. Carl Heller gives 67 prison inmates at Oregon State Prison in Salem $5 per month and $25 per testicular tissue biopsy in compensation for allowing him to perform irradiation experiments on their testes. If they receive vasectomies at the end of the study, the prisoners are given an extra $100 (Sharav, Goliszek).

Researchers inject a genetic compound called radioactive thymidine into the testicles of more than 100 Oregon State Penitentiary inmates to learn whether sperm production is affected by exposure to steroid hormones (Greger).

In a study published in Pediatrics, researchers at the University of California’s Department of Pediatrics use 113 newborns ranging in age from one hour to three days old in a series of experiments used to study changes in blood pressure and blood flow. In one study, doctors insert a catheter through the newborns’ umbilical arteries and into their aortas and then immerse the newborns’ feet in ice water while recording aortic pressure. In another experiment, doctors strap 50 newborns to a circumcision board, tilt the table so that all the blood rushes to their heads and then measure their blood pressure (Goliszek).

(1964 – 1967) The Dow Chemical Company pays Professor Kligman $10,000 to learn how dioxin — a highly toxic, carcinogenic component of Agent Orange — and other herbicides affect human skin because workers at the chemical plant have been developing an acne-like condition called Chloracne and the company would like to know whether the chemicals they are handling are to blame. As part of the study, Professor Kligman applies roughly the amount of dioxin Dow employees are exposed to on the skin 60 prisoners, and is disappointed when the prisoners show no symptoms of Chloracne. In 1980 and 1981, the human guinea pigs used in this study would begin suing Professor Kligman for complications including lupus and psychological damage (Kaye).

(1965)
As part of a test codenamed “Big Tom,” the Department of Defense sprays Oahu, Hawaii’s most heavily populated island, with Bacillus globigii in order to simulate an attack on an island complex. Bacillus globigii causes infections in people with weakened immune systems, but this was not known to scientists at the time (Goliszek, Martin).

(1966)
U.S. Army scientists drop light bulbs filled with Bacillus subtilis through ventilation gates and into the New York City subway system, exposing more than one million civilians, including women and children, to the bacteria (Goliszek).

(1967)
The CIA places a chemical in the drinking water supply of the FDA headquarters in Washington, D.C. to see whether it is possible to spike drinking water with LSD and other substances (Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).

In a study published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, researchers inject pregnant women with radioactive cortisol to see if the radioactive material will cross the placentas and affect the fetuses (Goliszek).

The U.S. Army pays Professor Kligman to apply skin-blistering chemicals to Holmesburg Prison inmates’ faces and backs, so as to, in Professor Kligman’s words, “learn how the skin protects itself against chronic assault from toxic chemicals, the so-called hardening process,” information which would have both offensive and defensive applications for the U.S. military (Kaye).

Professor Kligman develops Retin-A as an acne cream (and eventually a wrinkle cream), turning him into a multi-millionaire (Kaye).

Researchers paralyze 64 prison inmates in California with a neuromuscular compound called succinylcholine, which produces suppressed breathing that feels similar to drowning. When five prisoners refuse to participate in the medical experiment, the prison’s special treatment board gives researchers permission to inject the prisoners with the drug against their will (Greger).

(1968)
Planned Parenthood of San Antonio and South Central Texas and the Southwest Foundation for Research and Education begin an oral contraceptive study on 70 poverty-stricken Mexican-American women, giving only half the oral contraceptives they think they are receiving and the other half a placebo. When the results of this study are released a few years later, it stirs tremendous controversy among Mexican-Americans (Sharav, Sauter).

(1969)
Experimental drugs are tested on mentally disabled children in Milledgeville, Ga., without any institutional approval whatsoever (Sharav).

Judge Sam Steinfield’s dissent in Strunk v. Strunk, 445 S.W.2d 145 marks the first time a judge has ever suggested that the Nuremberg Code be applied in American court cases (Sharav).

(1970)
Under order from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which also sponsored the Tuskegee Experiment, the free childcare program at Johns Hopkins University collects blood samples from 7,000 African-American youth, telling their parents that they are checking for anemia but actually checking for an extra Y chromosome (XYY), believed to be a biological predisposition to crime. The program director, Digamber Borganokar, does this experiment without Johns Hopkins University’s permission (Greger, Merritte, et al.).

(1971)
Stanford University conducts the Stanford Prison Experiment on a group of college students in order to learn the psychology of prison life. Some students are given the role as prison guards, while the others are given the role of prisoners. After only six days, the proposed two-week study has to end because of its psychological effects on the participants. The “guards” had begun to act sadistic, while the “prisoners” started to show signs of depression and severe psychological stress (University of New Hampshire).

An article entitled “Viral Infections in Man Associated with Acquired Immunological Deficiency States” appears in Federation Proceedings. Dr. MacArthur and Fort Detrick’s Special Operations Division have, at this point, been conducting mycoplasma research to create a synthetic immunosuppressive agent for about one year, again suggesting that this research may have produced HIV (Goliszek).

(1973)
An Ad Hoc Advisory Panel issues its Final Report on the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, writing, “Society can no longer afford to leave the balancing of individual rights against scientific progress to the scientific community” (Sharav).

(1977)
The National Urban League holds its National Conference on Human Experimentation, stating, “We don’t want to kill science but we don’t want science to kill, mangle and abuse us” (Sharav).

(1978)
The CDC begins experimental hepatitis B vaccine trials in New York. Its ads for research subjects specifically ask for promiscuous homosexual men. Professor Wolf Szmuness of the Columbia University School of Public Health had made the vaccine’s infective serum from the pooled blood serum of hepatitis-infected homosexuals and then developed it in chimpanzees, the only animal susceptible to hepatitis B, leading to the theory that HIV originated in chimpanzees before being transferred over to humans via this vaccine. A few months after 1,083 homosexual men receive the vaccine, New York physicians begin noticing cases of Kaposi’s sarcoma, Mycoplasma penetrans and a new strain of herpes virus among New York’s homosexual community — diseases not usually seen among young, American men, but that would later be known as common opportunistic diseases associated with AIDS (Goliszek).

(1980)
According to blood samples tested years later for HIV, 20 percent of all New York homosexual men who participated in the 1978 hepatitis B vaccine experiment are HIV-positive by this point (Goliszek).

The first AIDS case appears in San Francisco (Goliszek).

(1981)
The CDC acknowledges that a disease known as AIDS exists and confirms 26 cases of the disease — all in previously healthy homosexuals living in New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles — again supporting the speculation that AIDS originated from the hepatitis B experiments from 1978 and 1980 (Goliszek).

(1982)
Thirty percent of the test subjects used in the CDC’s hepatitis B vaccine experiment are HIV-positive by this point (Goliszek).

(1985)
A former U.S. Army sergeant tries to sue the Army for using drugs on him in without his consent or even his knowledge in United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669. Justice Antonin Scalia writes the decision, clearing the U.S. military from any liability in past, present or future medical experiments without informed consent (Merritte, et al..

(1987)
Philadelphia resident Doris Jackson discovers that researchers have removed her son’s brain post mortem for medical study. She later learns that the state of Pennsylvania has a doctrine of “implied consent,” meaning that unless a patient signs a document stating otherwise, consent for organ removal is automatically implied (Merritte, et al.).

(1988)
(1988 – 2001) The New York City Administration for Children’s Services begins allowing foster care children living in about two dozen children’s homes to be used in National Institutes of Health-sponsored (NIH) experimental AIDS drug trials. These children — totaling 465 by the program’s end — experience serious side effects, including inability to walk, diarrhea, vomiting, swollen joints and cramps. Children’s home employees are unaware that they are giving the HIV-infected children experimental drugs, rather than standard AIDS treatments (New York City ACS, Doran).

(1990)
The United States sends 1.7 million members of the armed forces, 22 percent of whom are African-American, to the Persian Gulf for the Gulf War (“Desert Storm”). More than 400,000 of these soldiers are ordered to take an experimental nerve agent medication called pyridostigmine, which is later believed to be the cause of Gulf War Syndrome — symptoms ranging from skin disorders, neurological disorders, incontinence, uncontrollable drooling and vision problems — affecting Gulf War veterans (Goliszek; Merritte, et al.).

The CDC and Kaiser Pharmaceuticals of Southern California inject 1,500 six-month-old black and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles with an “experimental” measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States. Adding to the risk, children less than a year old may not have an adequate amount of myelin around their nerves, possibly resulting in impaired neural development because of the vaccine. The CDC later admits that parents were never informed that the vaccine being injected into their children was experimental (Goliszek).

The FDA allows the U.S. Department of Defense to waive the Nuremberg Code and use unapproved drugs and vaccines in Operation Desert Shield (Sharav).

(1992)
Columbia University’s New York State Psychiatric Institute and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine give 100 males — mostly African-American and Hispanic, all between the ages of six and 10 and all the younger brothers of juvenile delinquents — 10 milligrams of fenfluramine (fen-fen) per kilogram of body weight in order to test the theory that low serotonin levels are linked to violent or aggressive behavior. Parents of the participants received $125 each, including a $25 Toys ‘R’ Us gift certificate (Goliszek).

(1994)
President Clinton appoints the Advisory Commission on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE), which finally reveals the horrific experiments conducted during the Cold War era in its ACHRE Report.

(1995)
A 19-year-old University of Rochester student named Nicole Wan dies from participating in an MIT-sponsored experiment that tests airborne pollutant chemicals on humans. The experiment pays $150 to human test subjects (Sharav).

In the Mar. 15 President’s Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE), former human subjects, including those who were used in experiments as children, give sworn testimonies stating that they were subjected to radiation experiments and/or brainwashed, hypnotized, drugged, psychologically tortured, threatened and even raped during CIA experiments. These sworn statements include:

* Christina DeNicola’s statement that, in Tucson, Ariz., from 1966 to 1976, “Dr. B” performed mind control experiments using drugs, post-hypnotic injection and drama, and irradiation experiments on her neck, throat, chest and uterus. She was only four years old when the experiments started.

* Claudia Mullen’s testimony that Dr. Sidney Gottlieb (of MKULTRA fame) used chemicals, radiation, hypnosis, drugs, isolation in tubs of water, sleep deprivation, electric shock, brainwashing and emotional, sexual and verbal abuse as part of mind control experiments that had the ultimate objective of turning her, who was only a child at the time, into the “perfect spy.” She tells the advisory committee that researchers justified this abuse by telling her that she was serving her country “in their bold effort to fight Communism.”

* Suzanne Starr’s statement that “a physician, who was retired from the military, got children from the mountains of Colorado for experiments.” She says she was one of those children and that she was the victim of experiments involving environmental deprivation to the point of forced psychosis, spin programming, injections, rape and frequent electroshock and mind control sessions. “I have fought self-destructive programmed messages to kill myself, and I know what a programmed message is, and I don’t act on them,” she tells the advisory committee of the experiments’ long-lasting effects, even in her adulthood (Goliszek).

President Clinton publicly apologizes to the thousands of people who were victims of MKULTRA and other mind-control experimental programs (Sharav).

President Clinton appoints the National Bioethics Advisory Committee (Sharav).

Justice Edward Greenfield of the New York State Supreme Court rules that parents do not have the right to volunteer their mentally incapacitated children for non-therapeutic medical research studies and that no mentally incapacitated person whatsoever can be used in a medical experiment without informed consent (Sharav).

(1996)
Professor Adil E. Shamoo of the University of Maryland and the organization Citizens for Responsible Care and Research sends a written testimony on the unethical use of veterans in medical research to the U.S. Senate’s Committee on Governmental Affairs, stating: “This type of research is on-going nationwide in medical centers and VA hospitals supported by tens of millions of dollars of taxpayers money. These experiments are high risk and are abusive, causing not only physical and psychic harm to the most vulnerable groups but also degrading our society’s system of basic human values. Probably tens of thousands of patients are being subjected to such experiments” (“Testimony of Adil E. Shamoo, Ph.D.”).

The Department of Defense admits that Gulf War soldiers were exposed to chemical agents; however, 33 percent of all military personnel afflicted with Gulf War Syndrome never left the United States during the war, discrediting the popular mainstream belief that these symptoms are a result of exposure to Iraqi chemical weapons (Merritte, et al.).

President Clinton issues a formal apology to the subjects of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and their families (Sharav).

(1997)
In an experiment sponsored by the U.S. government, researchers withhold medical treatment from HIV-positive African-American pregnant women, giving them a placebo rather than AIDS medication (Sharav).

On Sept. 18, victims of unethical medical experiments at major U.S. research centers, including the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH) testify before the National Bioethics Advisory Committee (Sharav).

(1999)
Adil E. Shamoo, Ph.D. testifies on “The Unethical Use of Human Beings in High-Risk Research Experiments” before the U.S. House of Representatives’ House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, alerting the House on the use of American veterans in VA Hospitals as human guinea pigs and calling for national reforms (“Testimony of Adil E. Shamoo, Ph.D.”).

Doctors at the University of Pennsylvania inject 18-year-old Jesse Gelsinger with an experimental gene therapy as part of an FDA-approved clinical trial. He dies four days later and his father suspects that he was not fully informed of the experiment’s risk (Goliszek)

During a clinical trial investigating the effectiveness of Propulsid for infant acid reflux, nine-month-old Gage Stevens dies at Children’s Hospital in Pittsburgh (Sharav).

(2000)
The U.S. Air Force and rocket maker Lockheed Martin sponsor a Loma Linda University study that pays 100 Californians $1,000 to eat a dose of perchlorate — a toxic component of rocket fuel that causes cancer, damages the thyroid gland and hinders normal development in children and fetuses — every day for six months. The dose eaten by the test subjects is 83 times the safe dose of perchlorate set by the State of California, which has perchlorate in some of its drinking water. This Loma Linda study is the first large-scale study to use human subjects to test the harmful effects of a water pollutant and is “inherently unethical,” according to Environmental Working Group research director Richard Wiles (Goliszek, Envirnomental Working Group).

(2001)
On its website, the FDA admits that its policy to include healthy children in human experiments “has led to an increasing number of proposals for studies of safety and pharmacokinetics, including those in children who do not have the condition for which the drug is intended” (Goliszek).

In Higgins and Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute The Maryland Court of Appeals makes a landmark decision regarding the use of children as test subjects, prohibiting non-therapeutic experimentation on children on the basis of “best interest of the individual child” (Sharav).

(2002)
President George W. Bush signs the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA), offering pharmaceutical companies six-month exclusivity in exchange for running clinical drug trials on children. This will of course increase the number of children used as human test subjects (Hammer Breslow).

(2003)
Two-year-old Michael Daddio of Delaware dies of congestive heart failure. After his death, his parents learn that doctors had performed an experimental surgery on him when he was five months old, rather than using the established surgical method of repairing his congenital heart defect that the parents had been told would be performed. The established procedure has a 90- to 95-percent success rate, whereas the inventor of the procedure performed on baby Daddio would later be fired from his hospital in 2004 (Willen and Evans, “Parents of Babies Who Died in Delaware Tests Weren’t Warned”).

(2004)
In his BBC documentary “Guinea Pig Kids” and BBC News article of the same name, reporter Jamie Doran reveals that children involved in the New York City foster care system were unwitting human subjects in experimental AIDS drug trials from 1988 to, in his belief, present times (Doran).

(2005)
In response to the BBC documentary and article “Guinea Pig Kids”, the New York City Administration of Children’s Services (ACS) sends out an Apr. 22 press release admitting that foster care children were used in experimental AIDS drug trials, but says that the last trial took place in 2001 and thus the trials are not continuing, as BBC reporter Jamie Doran claims. The ACS gives the extent and statistics of the experimental drug trials, based on its own records, and contracts the Vera Institute of Justice to conduct “an independent review of ACS policy and practice regarding the enrollment of HIV-positive children in foster care in clinical drug trials during the late 1980s and 1990s” (New York City ACS).

Bloomberg releases a series of reports suggesting that SFBC, the largest experimental drug testing center of its time, exploits immigrant and other low-income test subjects and runs tests with limited credibility due to violations of both the FDA’s and SFBC’s own testing guidelines (Bloomberg).

In October 2005, the American Chemistry Council gave the EPA $2.1 million to study how children ranging from infancy to three years old ingest, inhale or absorb chemicals. Like IG Farben was for the German pharmaceutical companies of Nazi Germany, the American Chemistry Council acts much like a front group for chemical industry bigwigs like Bayer (which was incidentally also a member of IG Farben), BP, Chevron, Dow, DuPont, Exxon, Honeywell, 3M, Monsanto and Procter & Gamble. Studies have already proven that the chemicals made by these companies have long-term effects on children and adults. A short, two-year study like CHEERS would of course fail to reveal these long-term effects and the American Chemistry Council could then publicize these findings as “proof” that its chemicals were safe.

2006 – 2007
Merck begins pushing U.S. states to mandate the vaccination of teenage girls with Gardasil, a vaccine they claim prevents HPV, a sexually-transmitted virus. In February 2007, Texas Gov. Rick Perry — who was revealed to have financial ties with Merck, the vaccine manufacturer — mandates the vaccine in teenage girls (see http://www.newstarget.com/021572.html ). A key Merck lobbyist named Mike Toomey, it turned out, had served as Gov. Rick Perry’s chief of staff.

The Texas decision to mandate the vaccine was a notable and troubling milestone in public health policy because it is the first time a vaccine is mandated for a disease that cannot be contracted through casual contact in public schools. It also invoked “gunpoint medicine,” or the threat of arrest at gunpoint for not agreeing to receive state-mandated injections.

The Gardasil vaccinations remain a grand medical experiment being performed on children because it is not yet known what the long-term side effects of the vaccination will be, nor whether the vaccinations will actually lower rates of cervical cancer as intended.

2007
Maryland’s governor and public health officials, fed up with the unwillingness of over 2,000 parents to have their children vaccinated, invoke gunpoint medicine yet again by threatening the parents with arrest and up to 30 days of imprisonment if they don’t submit their children to state-mandated vaccinations. The children and parents are later rounded up at a county courthouse, guarded by attack dogs and security personnel, while a district Judge oversees the mass injection of schoolchildren with vaccines that contain toxic mercury. (See http://www.newstarget.com/022242.html )

Present day: New Jersey mandates the mass vaccination of all children with four different vaccines, stripping away the health freedoms of parents and unleashing a mass medical experiment that exploits the bodies of children and enriches pharmaceutical companies while criminalizing parents who refuse to participate.

Works Cited
Alliance for Human Research Protection. “‘Monster Experiment’ Taught Orphans to Stutter.”. June 11, 2001.

Barker, Allen. “The Cold War Experiments.” Mind Control.

Berdon, Victoria. “Codes of Medical and Human Experimentation Ethics.” The Least of My Brothers.

Brinker, Wendy. “James Marion Sims: Father Butcher.” Seed Show.

Burton Report. “Human Experimentation, Plutonium and Col. Stafford Warren.”

Cockburn, Alexander and Jeffrey St. Clair, eds. “Germ War: The U.S. Record.” Counter Punch.

“Donald Ewan [sic] Cameron.” Wikipedia.

Doran, Jamie. “Guinea Pig Kids.” BBC News. 30 Nov. 2004.

Drug Development-Technology.com. “SFBC.”

Elliston, Jon. “MKULTRA: CIA Mind Control.” Dossier: Paranormal Government.

Environmental Working Group. “U.S.: Lockheed Martin’s Tests on Humans.” CorpWatch.

Global Security. Chemical Corps. 2005.

Goliszek, Andrew. In the Name of Science. New York: St. Martin’s, 2003.

Greger, Michael, M.D. Heart Failure: Diary of a Third Year Medical Student.

Griffiths, Joel and Chris Bryson. “Toxic Secrets: Fluoride and the Atom Bomb.” Nexus Magazine 5:3. Apr. – May 1998.

Hammer Breslow, Lauren. “The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act of 2002: The Rise of the Voluntary Incentive Structure and Congressional Refusal to Require Pediatric Testing.” Harvard Journal of Legislation Vol. 40.

“Human Experimentation: Before the Nazi Era and After.” Micah Books.

Kaye, Jonathan. “Retin-A’s Wrinkled Past.” Mind Control. Orig. pub. Penn History Review Spring 1997.

“Manhattan Project: Oak Ridge.” World Socialist Web Site. Oct. 18, 2002.

Meiklejohn, Gordon N., M.D. “Commission on Influenza.” Histories of the Commissions. Ed. Theodore E. Woodward, M.D. The Armed Forced Epidemiological Board. 1994.

Merritte, LaTasha, et al.. “The Banality of Evil: Human Medical Experimentation in the United States.” The Public Law Online Journal. Spring 1999.

Milgram, Stanley. “Milgram Experiment.” Wikipedia. 2006.

New York City Administration of Children’s Services. Press release. 22 Apr. 2005.

“Operation Plumbbob.” Wikipedia. 2005.

“Operation Whitecoat.” Religion and Ethics (Episode no. 708). Oct. 24, 2003.

Organic Consumers Association. “EPA and Chemical Industry to Study the Effects of Known Toxic Chemicals on Children”. 12 Apr. 2005.

Pacchioli, David. Subjected to Science. Mar. 1996.

“Placebo Effect.” Encyclopedia of Alternative Medicine. 2006.

“Project Paperclip.” Wikipedia’ target=’_blank’>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Paperclip”>Wikipedia. 2005.

“Reviews and Notes: History of Medicine: Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America before the Second World War.” Annals of Internal Medicine 123:2. July 15, 1995.

Sharav, Vera Hassner. “Human Experiments: A Chronology of Human Rsearch.” Alliance for Human Research Protection.

Sauter, Daniel. Guide to MS 83 [Planned Parenthood of San Antonio and South Central Texas Records, 1931 – 1999]. University of Texas Library. Apr. 2001.

“Testimony of Adil E. Shamoo, Ph.D.” News from the Joint Hearing on Suspension of Medical Research at West Los Angeles and Sepulveda VA Medical Facilities and Informed Consent and Patient Safety in VA Medical Research. 21 Apr. 1999.

University of New Hampshire. “Chronology of Cases Involving Unethical Treatment of Human Subjects.” Responsible Conduct of Research.

University of Virginia Health System Health Sciences Library. “Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study.” 2004.

U.S. Department of Energy. “Chapter 8: Postwar TBI-Effects Experimentation: Continued Reliance on Sick Patients in Place of Healthy “Normals.” Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE) Final Report.

Veterans Health Administration. Project 112/Project SHAD. May 26, 2005.

Willen, Liz and David Evans. “Doctor Who Died in Drug Test Was Betrayed by System He Trusted.” Bloomberg. Nov. 2, 2005.

—. “Parents of Babies Who Died in Delaware Tests Weren’t Warned.” Bloomberg. Nov. 2, 2005.

Categories : Blog / Vlog, The Law & CODEX

New Jersey First to Require Mercury-Laden Flu Shots

By Administrator on December 13, 2007 1 Comments

On December 11, 2007, outgoing New Jersey Health Commissioner Fred Jacobs gave a gift to Merck, the vaccine and pharmaceutical giant: every pres schooler in New Jersey must receive the flu-enriched shot along with other dangerous vaccines. Parental objections were over ridden by Jacobs who dismissed. Councilwoman Charlotte Vandervalk (R-Bergen) opposed the regulations and has introduced a bill to make exemptions on conviction alone an option for parents. Merck’s Corporate headquarters is in Whitehouse Station, New Jersey.

You can let the Commissioner know how you feel about this by going to the following NJ state link and completing the Comment Form, selecting “General Feedback” in the Program field: http://www.nj.gov/health/feedback.shtml – please be polite…

We’ll also be following these developments through our fellow foundation trustee Ralph Fucetola JD and his blog,
http://vitaminlawyerhealthfreedom.blogspot.com

And you can Take Action here:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=21833

———————————————-
Here is the article from the Jersey Journal:

The Jersey Journal
PRE-K FLU VAX
Jersey order to be first some parents oppose it
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
TRENTON – New Jersey moved yesterday toward becoming the first state to require flu shots for preschoolers after a health advisory board backed new vaccine mandates over the opposition of worried parents.
The Public Health Council voted to require New Jersey children attending preschool or licensed day care to get annual flu shots, and to get three additional vaccines for youngsters starting Sept. 1, 2008.
No other state requires preschool, day care or older students to get flu shots, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics.
The state’s health commissioner, Dr. Fred M. Jacobs, has until next Tuesday to sign off on the mandates, though they have already been approved by Gov. Jon S. Corzine. Health Department spokesman Tom Slater said Jacobs was expected sign off on the proposal.
Besides the flu shots, New Jersey also will require preschoolers to get a pneumococcal vaccine and sixth-graders to get a whooping cough booster shot and a meningitis shot.
“Implementation of these rules will save lives and prevent disease and suffering in children, their families and the community,” deputy health commissioner Dr. Eddy Bresnitz told the council yesterday.
The Council voted in favor of the requirements 5-2, with one abstention, with member Dennis San Filippo saying he would like to see studies done on whether it’s safe for young children to get so many doses of different vaccines.
All four vaccines are recommended by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Academy of Pediatrics and other medical groups.
Parents concerned about possible dangers of the new vaccines and government intrusion in family medical decisions have been trying to block the new shots.
They note that flu vaccines contain trace amounts of mercury, a toxic heavy metal, and that mercury-free shots can be difficult to obtain.
According to the CDC and other scientific groups, there’s no convincing evidence the trace amounts of mercury in flu shots cause harm.
Following the vote yesterday, concerned parents said they will keep urging support for a bill that would give parents a right to a “philosophical objection” to vaccine mandates, as many other states have.
The new vaccines will be available for free for low-income families through the federal Vaccines for Children program, and private insurers generally will cover the cost, Bresnitz said.
———————————

And this is what the Star Ledger reported about Assemblywoman Vandervalk, leading the opposition to forced vaccinations:

“I’m gravely concerned about what’s happening here today,” said Assemblywoman Charlotte Vandervalk (R-Bergen), a sponsor of a bill (A165) that would allow parents to opt out of the vaccine mandates by filing a “conscientious exemption” form with the local health department.

“With New Jersey reporting the highest incidence of autism and a cause yet to be identified, we don’t know what will happen,” she said. “What happened to our freedom?”
——————————–

It is our hope that lots of Jersians and others concerned with this issue will send strong messages of support for Assembly member Vandervalk’s strong, principled stands against the “clout” of Big Pharma. Her bill has been “prefiled” for the new legislature that starts meeting in January. We’ve spoken to her office and she appreciates all the support that can be generated for this bill.

Please check back for updates and new Action Items.

And, of course, we need your generous help to make this possible:
https://staging.drrimatruthreports.com/index.php/index.php?page_id=189

———————————————–

UPDATE

The following is a sample of information we’re continually receiving about the Compulsory Vaccination issue and is reprinted here to give you an idea of how important this issue is becoming. With your help, we can magnify our “netroots” (Internet grassroots) impact on public policy. Please make sure you get your friends and email contacts to join the eAlert list at www.healthfreedomusa.org today!

From our DC advocate, Charles Frohman – http://www.cfrohman.com/

1. Alberta Health halts mumps inoculations
Posted by: “C. F.” cfroh@yahoo.com cfroh
Date: Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:37 pm ((PST))

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/
Alberta Health halts mumps inoculations

The Canadian Press
December 12, 2007

Edmonton — Alberta has suspended its campaign to vaccinate young
people against mumps because of severe allergic reactions to the vaccine.

Alberta Health says it is holding off on inoculating 17- to
26-year-olds after five young people with a history of allergies had
bad responses.

All five have recovered.

The campaign was undertaken because of an outbreak of mumps around the
province.
________________________________________________________________________

Maryland Mass Forced Vaccination Update –

2. 700 Maryland parents exposed to jail for nonvaccination
Posted by: “C. F.” cfroh@yahoo.com cfroh
Date: Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:37 pm ((PST))

http://www.washingtonpost.com/

More Students Are Vaccinated

The number of Prince George’s County students who have not met the
state’s immunization requirements dropped by more than half over the
past month after State’s Attorney Glenn F. Ivey (D) threatened
students’ parents with fines and possible jail time, a school system
spokesman said Monday.

Spokesman John White said that 1,084 students had not received a full
program of shots for chicken pox and hepatitis B as of Saturday. This
was a significant improvement over the situation Nov. 13, when Ivey
and school officials sent a letter to the parents of more than 2,300
students warning that they could face a $50 fine for each day they
were out of compliance or up to 10 days in jail.

“The letter certainly got people’s attention,” White said. “It had the
desired effect.”

Many parents reported to free clinics to get their children the
vaccines; others provided proof that they’d gotten the immunizations
in the past. Parents may also request medical and religious exemptions
from the immunization requirement, which the state put into effect in
January.

Of those who have not gotten immunized, White said slightly more than
700 students’ parents — what White called “chronic” cases where there
is no sign that they have made an effort to get immunized or provide
an exemption — have been referred to Ivey’s office for possible legal
action.

Ramon V. Korionoff, a spokesman for Ivey’s office, said last week that
no parents had been fined or jailed.

________________________________________________________________________

3. Merck recalls over 1m doses of children’s vaccine
Posted by: “C. F.” cfroh@yahoo.com cfroh
Date: Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:37 pm ((PST))

http://www.blacklistednews.com/view.asp?ID=4989

Merck recalls over 1m doses of children’s vaccine
Published on Thursday, December 13, 2007.

AddThis Social Bookmarking Widget

Source: AP – Media Monarchy

merck recalls over 1m doses of children’s vaccine
More than a million doses of a common vaccine given to babies as young
as two months was being recalled Wednesday because of contamination
risks, but the top U.S. health official said it was not a health threat.

The recall is for 1.2 million doses of the vaccine for Hib, which
protects against meningitis, pneumonia and other serious infections,
and a combination vaccine for Hib and hepatitis B. The vaccine is
recommended for all children under 5 and is usually given in a
three-shot series, starting at two months.

Drug maker Merck & Co., which announced the recall after testing
showed a sterilization problem in a Pennsylvania factory, said
concerned parents should contact their child’s doctor.

“The potential for contamination of any individual vaccine is low,”
said Merck spokeswoman Kelly Dougherty.

Dr. Julie Gerberding, head of the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, echoed that in a news conference.

“This is not a health threat in the short run, but it is an
inconvenience,” she said.

________________________________________________________________________

5. Re: Bush Set To Veto To Remove Mercury From Infant Vaccines
Posted by: “Charles D. Frohman” cfroh@yahoo.com cfroh
Date: Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:37 pm ((PST))

Thanks! I blogged about this and would love it if you commented: click
www.CommonInterest.info and scroll down to “pre-holiday threats to liberty”

Jessica Frohman wrote: Since you seemed interested
in the subject and its one I am informed about as well… thought you might be
interested in this…
Bush Set To Veto To Remove Mercury From Infant Vaccines Infant Vaccines

President Bush would veto the HHS-Labor-Education Appropriations Bill because of
the cost and “objectionable provisions” such as a measure to ban the use of
childhood flu vaccines that contain thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative.

Autism advocacy groups are outraged because President Bush stated in a
questionnaire during his 2004 campaign: “I support the removal of Thimerosal
from vaccines on the childhood national vaccine schedule. During a second term
as President, I will continue to support increased funding to support a wide
variety of research initiatives aimed at seeking definitive causes and/or
triggers of autism. It is important to note that while there are many possible
theories about causes or triggers of autism, no one material has been definitely
included or excluded.”

But since 2005, President Bush has steadfastly refused to issue an Executive
Order banning high amounts of mercury in vaccines that would protect children
and pregnant women despite repeated requests from the autism community that he
uphold his campaign promise. Under his current administration, mercury has been
and will continue to be knowingly injected into the youngest of American
citizens. The controversial mercury-containing preservative thimerosal has been
linked by thousands of parents as being the cause of their children’s mercury
poisoning and autism.

The flu vaccine which continues to be manufactured with mercury is recommended
for all pregnant women, infants and children despite the fact that the Institute
of Medicine in 2001 recommended against the policy of exposing these same
sensitive groups to thimerosal containing vaccines. According to the EPA, one in
every six women of childbearing age already has blood levels of mercury high
enough to cause neurological damage to their unborn children due to
environmental exposures alone.

“Injecting even more mercury into the bodies of pregnant women, infants and
children when it is not a necessary component of vaccines is just bad medicine,”
said Lyn Redwood, president of SafeMinds and parent of a mercury-injured child.
“It defies logic that a flu vaccine must be disposed of as a hazardous waste if
it is not used, but somehow injecting the same mercury-containing vaccine into a
baby is safe.”

Charles D. Frohman
202-536-4346 (office)/202-258-8027 (mobile)
________________________________________________________________________
6. Vaccine Politics
Posted by: “C. F.” cfroh@yahoo.com cfroh
Date: Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:37 pm ((PST))

http://infowars.net/articles/december2007/131207Vaccine.htm

Vaccine Politics

Rick Fisk
Lew Rockwell.com
Thursday December 13, 2007

The first vaccine mandated by governments was the small pox vaccine.
Today, you’ll hear any number of medical professionals refer to the
vaccine as proof of Western military medicine’s superiority over any
other discipline. The World Health Organization proclaims proudly to
anyone who will listen that the vaccine has eradicated smallpox (yet
for a disease “indistinguishable from smallpox,” apply the same
vaccine used to protect against smallpox).

So prevalent is the favorable view of vaccines, that people who
question this “truism” are ridiculed. But, when the vaccine had been
about 100 years old (it is now over 200 years old), it had its
detractors. One of them was a scientist, Alfred Russel Wallace.

Wallace was an interesting man. His list of accomplishments is
stunning. Sometimes referred to in England as the “Grand Old Man of
Science,” he continued to produce papers into his 90s. A reluctant
socialist, he felt that science and government didn’t mix and had no
problem arguing against government involvement in science.

Wallace focused on biology and zoology in his early career and turned
to social issues later in life. One such social issue was vaccination.
He noted in 1906 that doctors were not the best judges of a vaccine’s
efficacy though they were continuously consulted on vaccination policy
by government officials.

In the first place they are interested parties, both pecuniarily
and in a much greater degree on account of professional training and
prestige. Only three years after vaccination was first introduced, on
the recommendation of the heads of the profession, and their expressed
conviction that it would give lifelong protection against a terrible
disease, Parliament voted Jenner [the scientist who created the
smallpox vaccine derived from cowpox] £10,000 in 1802, and £20,000
more in 1807, besides endowing vaccination with £3,000 a year in 1808.
From that time doctors as a body were committed to its support; it has
been taught for nearly a century as an almost infallible remedy in all
our medical schools; and has been for the most part accepted by the
public and the legislature as if it were a well-established scientific
principle, instead of being as the historian of epidemic diseases –
Dr. Creighton – well terms it, a grotesque superstition.

This quote is from a summary of his original arguments against
mandatory use of the smallpox vaccine in 1889: Vaccination: Proved
Useless & Dangerous. (Wallace wasn’t one for mincing words.) The 1889
work was an epidemiological study which showed that smallpox rates in
London and the rest of England were not reduced at all by the
mandatory use of the vaccine. In fact, other illnesses increased
during the time that the smallpox vaccination was forced on the
population suggesting that the effect on immunity was negative rather
than positive as vaccination proponents kept asserting.

The 1889 study was instrumental in influencing public opinion and
ultimately forcing the repeal of laws making smallpox vaccination
mandatory in England. Other European nations followed suit. The U.S.
government’s medical and scientific organizations and the World Health
Organization have disregarded Wallace’s findings, as well as a long
list of subsequent papers and corroborations, and have proclaimed that
the smallpox vaccine was a smashing success.

This has occurred, in spite of the fact that there have been no
counter-examples to disprove the contrary view. There have been many
examples since which tend to support Wallace’s conclusions however.

For instance, one of the most stunning antidotes to the idea that
smallpox was eradicated due to mandatory vaccination is the Japanese
example. The practice of “revaccination” was prevalent there (and in
the British Navy) until their vaccination rate exceeded 100%! In spite
of this, Japan faced huge smallpox epidemics. All told, the Japanese
lost 48,000 people to smallpox, most of them vaccinated at least once.
When the government stopped the mandatory vaccinations, the epidemics
were finally arrested. Were the smallpox vaccination truly effective
as a prophylactic, such an example could not exist. Unfortunately,
there are dozens just like it all over the world.

In 1904, the U.S. Army decided to forcibly vaccinate the Philippine
population ostensibly to improve health conditions but more likely
intended to protect military personnel. They touted its success when
in the following two years smallpox appeared to be under control.
However, from 1917 to 1919, in a population of 11 million that had a
reported 100% vaccination rate, smallpox epidemics claimed over 70,000
lives out of 163,000 reported infections.

By contrast, Australia, from 1900 to 1915, which never instituted a
mandatory vaccine program, reported 3 deaths due to smallpox over the
entire period.

A doctor who treated smallpox victims in San Antonio near the turn of
the century wrote of his experiences. Charles Campbell became so
trusted by his patients and coworkers that they agreed to allow him to
expose them to smallpox to help him prove his own theories about how
smallpox was transmitted, treated and how its effects could be minimized.

Only one of his patients received the pock marks so customarily
associated with the disease and that patient’s pock marks were “done
intentionally.” Dr. Campbell’s belief, based on his observations and
experience, was that smallpox was spread by bed bugs, a pest most of
us haven’t had to experience in our lifetimes but is making a
comeback. That the bed bug could be a vector makes logical sense given
what we know about the spread of smallpox to Native American
populations via blanket distributions. Viruses do not live for long
periods of time absent a host; unlike bacteria which can lay dormant
for decades while retaining viability. Bed bugs, like fleas, offer a
convenient host for a virus and can live for weeks without food in
unwashed bedding. Campbell’s work has been mostly ignored by the
establishment medical community and the press.

Why haven’t Campbell’s experiences, treatment results and the general
knowledge of the smallpox vaccine’s danger been more prevalent instead
of the current view that vaccines are a modern miracle?

This puzzling contradiction doesn’t just apply to the smallpox
vaccine. We’re told that polio’s low current rate of infection is due
to the vaccine. However, a closer look tends to discredit that idea as
well. Those who track world health statistics do not consider
vaccination as having reduced disease rates by any more than 3%
world-wide during the 19th and 20th centuries. The reduction in
infectious disease has been attributed to sanitary improvements or
natural immunity and natural disease cycles, not vaccination.
Furthermore, since 1970, there have been no cases of polio in the U.S.
which are not attributed to the vaccine itself.

In spite of the overwhelming evidence against the benefits of
vaccination, our own government health officials continue to recommend
a growing battery of vaccinations, starting with infants at birth. The
CDC’s recommended vaccination schedule(pdf) is staggering compared to
what it was just 20 years ago. If you strictly followed the CDC’s
recommendations, your child would have twenty-five vaccine injections
by the time they reached four years of age. What justifies such a number?

To be fair, the growing list of vaccinations is suggestive rather than
mandatory. That being said, there are government officials who use
these suggestions to augment the list of “mandatory” vaccinations that
children must have before attending public school. Think about that
for a second. How are state school boards qualified to mandate
vaccination schedules?

Doubts over the efficacy of vaccines appear to be increasing as
information has been made available. Until the internet, many of the
contrary studies were not available to the general public. We are only
recently discovering that what we’re told by our own government
agencies and the drug companies they appear to represent, are not
exactly representative of the facts.

The list of additives and basic ingredients found in many vaccines
would be otherwise advised against by ethical medical professionals,
but we are told repeatedly by our own FDA that there is no evidence to
suggest that injecting mercury (thimerosal) and other additives
directly into the bloodstream is harmful. Meanwhile, the EPA will send
in armed police to shut down somebody’s private business as an
immanent threat to the population if some bureaucrat happened to
detect mercury on or about the premises.

Why the disparity? Quite frankly, it is because the corporations who
create the vaccines have gained control over our regulatory agencies
and legislative bodies. The FDA’s regulations have been continuously
augmented internally and by Congress to protect pharmaceutical
companies from litigations. The Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting
System has been put in place to protect the public, but is really a
way to protect the drug companies from lawsuits.

Apathy and lack of confidence in ourselves has led to an irrational
reliance upon government experts employed by the, FDA, CDC and WHO to
inform us about the causes of disease and to control how our
government responds to health crises. That is a lot of power
concentrated in one place.

What has resulted from this unholy marriage of corporate interests and
the government is not public health but political medicine. Both
figuratively and literally, political medicine is poison that seeks to
destroy common sense, customer choice and too often, lives. When it
isn’t denying medication that has been proven useful to cancer
patients, it is attempting to mandate medicine and ban food supplements.

If one didn’t know any better, one might conclude that the FDA and
related health agencies of the federal government, want you to get sick.

________________________________________________________________________

And from Dr. Rebecca Carley –

Soldiers being trained to give immunizations to base civilians
http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=50931

By Jimmy Norris, Stars and Stripes
Pacific edition, Thursday December 13, 2007

YONGSAN GARRISON, South Korea — With even more family members on the way to
South Korea as part of the transformation of U.S. forces on the peninsula, the
18th Medical Command had some good news for those who will be seeking
immunizations.

Thanks to a team of instructors from Walter Reed Army Medical Center in
Washington, 19 more 18th Medical Command soldiers will be qualified Friday to
administer immunizations to civilians.

The instructor team was in South Korea to give a five-day immunology course to
medics.

Prior to the course, the medics were qualified to give immunizations only to
active-duty soldiers. The five days of training are normally part of Walter
Reed’s 5½-week immunization and allergy technician course.

But the cost and loss of manpower involved in sending them on temporary duty
for that training would not have been practical, said Master Sgt. Desmond Smith,
18th Medical Command spokesman.

“It’s easier to bring someone here than to send 19 soldiers to the States,”
he said.

The visiting instructors did not cover the allergy portion of the 5½-week
course, so students will not receive what the Army calls an additional skill
identifier. They will, however, receive a certificate of completion for their
training and a memorandum verifying they have completed the training necessary
to give immunizations to children.

“There was clearly a need at 121 [Combat Support Hospital] to increase the
number of people who could give pediatric immunizations,” said Maj. Cecilia
Mikita, who led the team from Walter Reed.

The training covered 20 types of immunizations and six ways to administer them.
It also included lectures on record keeping, the effects of various vaccines on
the body, and the proper handling and storage of vaccines.

Included in the hands-on portion of the course were stations at the hospitalÂ’s
pediatric immunization clinic, 1st Replacement CenterÂ’s medical in-processing
area, and Yongsan GarrisonÂ’s Troop Medical Clinic.

“A lot of stuff I learned on the job, but this course gives you a real
standard,” said student Pfc. David Dasilma. “I can educate my patients now and
tell them why they need a shot and what it does to their body.”

Smith said the training should lead to a decrease in wait times at immunization
clinics.

“It helps because if you come in for a shot there’s more than one person
available to give it now,” he said.

Dr. Carley Responds:

The idea that a 5 day course could prepare anyone to handle the consequences of
inoculations (which include anaphylactic shock and death) is insane. Worse yet,
“The visiting instructors did not cover the allergy portion”. As is explained
in my documents on www.drcarley.com, the corruption of the immune system caused
by inoculations with disease is what causes allergies, as well as all autoimmune
diseases and cancer.

This is the beginning: soldiers will now be shooting diseases, as well as
bullets. As you all know from the MSNBC links on my site, the bird flu vaccine
has already been licensed. The model state health emergency powers act gives
the governors of every state the authority to order inoculations be given to
citizens. The bird flu vaccine will cause the bird flu pandemic, which will
give the traitor in the white house an excuse to proclaim martial law. One of
his executive orders gives him the power to cancel the 2008 election in the case
of such a situation.

I tell you this not to scare you, but prepare you. Each of you must decide what
you will do when the knock comes on the door and you are ordered to take the
bird flu vaccine. The only way this can be stopped is to wake up enough people
that the plan does not work due to mass refusal, as occurred a couple of years
ago when Bush wanted all health workers to be inoculated with smallpox.

I ask each of you to send your own lists this e-mail, so they can send it out to
theirs, and so on. Let the truth spread like a virus, so the obvious plan is
not successful. There is nothing to fear but fear itself…the truth will set
us free. I do not believe this; I KNOW it.

Let’s roll….

Dr. Carley
—
Dr. Rebecca Carley
http://www.drcarley.com

*** Dr. Carley’s information is not intended to diagnose, treat or cure any
diseases. Rather, it is for educational purposes only. ***

Categories : Blog / Vlog, Hall of Shame, Legislation to Oppose, Medical Hazards, Miscellaneous

Natural Solutions Foundation Program: 2008

By Administrator on November 27, 2007 1 Comments

November 26, 2008

First of all, who is the Natural Solutions Foundation? We are a 501(c)(3) tax exempt humanitarian Non Governmental Organization (NGO). We focus on health and health freedom world wide communicating with national decision makers and consumers. Our internet presence is consistently orders of magnitude higher than any other similar organization and we consistently rank well within the top 30,000 US sites or better.

Because we see the health freedom issues as a series of multilayered, complex and interlocking relationships, and can translate the complexity to action for international decision makers and netroot supporters, we occupy a singular and powerful niche in the health freedom ecology. We have taken health freedom options to the international community where a part of the health freedom solution lies. We attend the meetings of, and work with delegates to, Codex Alimentarius (‘World Food Code’ – which impacts all food traded internationally and which serves, for the developing world as a compendium of food regulations) The participation, or lack thereof, by the developing nations which will determine their health and survival, the purity of much of their food supply and ours and can initiate a new level of planetary leadership in the evolution of a new medical paradigm and the freedom for all of us to heal and be healed.

No other entity fulfills both a domestic US and an international role of such growing power and significance. We have earned the trust of a growing number of developing nations and the fierce allegiance of our Netroots- YOU! And we thank you for that trust. Here is where we expect to put our efforts over the next year:

"The Results You get IS the Communication!"

– Bandler and Grinder

1. eDeclaration of Planetary Health and Freedom Rights

Giving due reference to the UN Declaration of Rights, The World Health Organization Declaration of Health Rights and the WHO Global strategy for Diet, Physical Activity and Health, the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki, the Wilmont Declaration and common law principles such as the The Herbalist’s Charter of Henry VIII, this document sets forth basic health and freedom principles for humanity to serve as a guide for national policy, organizational focus and NGO activity.

2. Legislator’s Health and Freedom eHandbook

In conjunction with the internationally significant Codex Two Step Process developed by our Codex Working Group and building on the existing legislative language which the natural Solutions foundation, in conjunction with advisors from other health and freedom organizations, the Natural Solutions Foundation proposes the creation of a Legislative Handbook to guide Federal and State legislators in reforming and re-framing the legislative landscape to support health and freedom choices for consumers, purveyors and practitioners. Just as the Natural Solutions Foundation Codex Book ("Codex two Step Process") () provides an example of the application of the legislative and regulatory framework which nations can use to protect their people and food supply from the errors embodies in Codex, so this handbook would provide a framework from which legislators can work. Other handbooks are in the planning stage.

3. New Media Communication Strategies for Effective Penetration of Information and Options

Tapping into the new internet expertise and creativity available to us, we have developed a program to capitalize on the working principles of the internet to shift from old media communications to new media ones at, as Bill Gates would say, "…the speed of thought…" Simply putting the equivalent of a page of printed matter up on the internet is no longer sufficient for effective communication. These new strategies, which the Natural Solutions Foundation is currently implementing (but which we propose for sharing with other members of the health and freedom community) include:

i. Participatory New Media Health Freedom Symposium where creatives and organizations which need their creativity can come together to create a synergistically productive outcome unforeseen by either segment before the meeting.

ii. Social Networking to attract and hold the attention of the internet user community world-wide. Through video, "FaceBook" – like virtual communities, YouTube postings and other "New Media" options, the Natural Solutions Foundation is radically changing its place on the internet and becoming a world leader in Health Freedom New Communications with the highest internet traffic ratings of any health freedom site or organization.

iii. Documentary film making can be part of either the old media or the new. We have chosen, with the collaboration Ecological Options Network to make it part of the new media through an innovative programmatic multimedia strategy. Instead of commissioning a full length DVD on Health Freedom and the Codex Agenda, we have instead evolved a program of stand-alone segments in a Health Freedom Library dealing with each of the current "hot button’ issues relevant to health freedom. This will allow the health freedom movement and the wellness industry to have information rapidly and accurately become available allowing us to build our circle of influence’s awareness and energy, generate funds, spur debate and educate decision makers on these issues. After completion of the rapidly generated health Freedom Library modules, the final interactive documentary/eresource will be produced as a permanent part of the new media.

4. Development of the Natural Solutions foundation’s virtual webstore, www.Organics4U.org.

Because we see the potential so clearly to simultaneously support the Wellness Industry and the health Freedom Advocates and practitioners who depend on its products through the use of the virtual store that we have created, we would like to develop-p an affiliate program allowing all health freedom organizations who are members of the working coalition to participate and help fund their activities while showing their strong support for clean, unadulterated health products and services. A Supporter’s Emporium is currently being developed to allow other goods and services to become available to the growing member base of the health freedom movement.

5. International health Freedom Advocacy Coalition of Health Friendly Countries and NGOs

The Natural Solutions Foundation has developed an unparalleled network of health friendly developing countries through their on-the-ground advocacy at Codex and in the home countries of the members of this emerging power center. We have developed exceptional access to health decision makers (e.g., Dr. Laibow addressing 43 Health Ministers in Mombasa, Kenya on HIV and Avian Flue prevention strategies and other related issues as well as Codex implications for their people’s health and longevity). These nations actively seek our participation in their decision making process.

For example, a large and important developing nation sought our legal and medical review of its new supplement regulations and we were able to significantly influence the proposed very low upper limits to alter them to much more liberal ones). The Natural Solutions Foundation has been invited by the entire West African bloc to conduct a series of training and policy meetings in Africa prior to codex meetings to assist that bloc in developing their positions and their choreographed responses to Codex items at the forthcoming meetings. In fact, such a meeting was scheduled which included the Presidents and Ministers of health of all 16 west African nations just prior to the last Codex Alimentarius Commission meeting (July, 2007). Funding was promised but failed to materialize so the meeting was never held. The trust and faith which the emerging pro health collation of developing nations’ places in us was exemplified when, because of scientific information provided by the Natural Solutions foundation to our friendly countries, fluoride was prevented from being approved as an additive in infant formula for healthy babies. This decision was taken through our advocacy, over the vigorous objection of the United States, the EU, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Mexico, Brazil and Argentina, thus demonstrating the power of the model.

While many issues pertain most strongly to the developing nations, there is an urgent need for leadership domestically as well as internationally on issues like vaccination, especially compulsory vaccination; other forms of compulsory drugging and limitation of factual information about the health benefits of food and traditional, natural and advanced therapies. The Natural Solutions Foundation has played a pivotal role in alerting and activating consumers and decision makers to these issues.

It is important to note that the Natural Solutions foundation’s continuing presence at Codex has allowed the Health Freedom voice to have a clear window on the interrelationship between adverse policies brought forward in Codex and the implementation of those same adverse policies through domestic regulation and legislation.

6. Creative Legislator Education and Litigation programs to preserve, protect, defend and restore Health and Freedom domestically and internationally.

With sufficient financial support from industry and interested donors, we believe that the legal recourses open to us are of significant potential in establishing case law to solidify health Freedom domestically and internationally.

1. The Natural Solutions Foundation has retained an experienced legislative consultant, Charles Frohman. Ideally, this activity, which currently employs the Trustees of the Foundation for 4 days a month in Washington DC . The relationships being developed have allowed us to engage in productive dialogues on a number of issues with Members of Congress.

2. We have supported the co-sponsorship of legislation to prevent parents from being forced to vaccinate or medicate their children (the importance and timeliness of which was tragically demonstrated on November 17 when 1600 parents were threatened with jail and fines if they failed to vaccinate, or in some cases, re-vaccinate, their children when either the school had lost their records or the parents did not wish to have them vaccinated.

3. The Natural Solutions Foundation has taken the lead in calling for hearings on the process of divesting the FDA of its food regulatory responsibility and numerous legislators are now seeking our input for legislative language for bills of interest to them.

7. Health Freedom Score Card

Working on the conviction that Health Freedom must be a topic of vigorous debate in the Presidential election discussion, the trustees of the natural Solutions Foundation were delighted to comply with the request they received from a Presidential Campaign to draft the Candidate’s Health Freedom Plank. Through a Health Freedom Score Card, which asks 19 tough questions of the Candidates regarding their public health freedom policies we have brought the issue into greater prominence through nearly 100,000 emails and faxes to the Presidential Candidates.

8. Citizens Petitions

Authorized by the First Amendments, Citizens Petitions are a legal mechanism to challenge government policies. We have initiated a Citizens Petition to force the FAD to abandon its declared harmonization policy with Codex restrictions on nutrient values. About 125,000 Americans have joined the Citizens Petition through signed documents.

Additional Citizens Petitions are in the planning stage.

9. International Decade of Nutrition

Hope for the Word through dynamic empowerment and the dissemination of natural solutions to the ancient twin scourges of mankind: hunger and disease.

Part of the solution to the health freedom threats lies in the Natural Solutions Foundation dynamic and far-reaching "International Decade of Nutrition". Because we understand that there is enough information already available to solve the world’s hunger problems and to eliminate most of the diseases of under-nutrition and water-born, parasite and other organism-based diseases, the Natural Solutions foundation has inaugurated a program to

1. Reclaim sustainable organic farming and disseminate the necessary advanced and under-utilized, low-tech, high impact technologies to allow farmers to gain the economic advantage to resist Agribiz and stay in their communities and on their farms while growing food without pesticides and other chemicals

2. Apply already existing, but little known technologies to eliminate parasitic and other organism-based diseases without the use of dangerous and expensive pharmaceuticals, pesticides, fungicides and other toxic chemicals through the use of inexpensive, effective and easily managed options

3. Widespread dissemination of information which empowers and reinforces the autonomy of populations currently disenfranchised from access to traditional, natural and advanced therapies.

ACTION STEP

What helps us the most?

Recurring gifts allow us to plan and budget our expenses. Large gifts allow us to attend Codex Meetings and work with global decision makers. US, African, European and Asian Codex trips are coming, one after the other, over the next few months!

For all donations:
https://staging.drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189

And please we have a wonderful documentary DVD project in the works, to include an extensive Health Freedom Library!

Earmark donations to the DVD "New Media" project here:
https://staging.drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189

Please give generously to support health and health freedom by supporting the largest, most effective health freedom group, the Natural Solutions Foundation! We are here for you!

Categories : Blog / Vlog, The Law & CODEX
« Previous Page
Next Page »