Natural Solutions Foundation
The Voice of Global Health Freedom™
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Should the US Government Continue to Participate in Codex Alimentarius?
Health Freedom Supporter Survey…
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/questionnaire.jsp?questionnaire_KEY=1042
New Action item to STOP the fake food safety bill, S510 –
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=4252
Here’s Dr. Rima’s View on Getting the US Out of Codex
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCni-LuR_c
Natural Solutions Foundation has been an unofficial observer at many Codex Alimentarius (World Food Code) meetings world wide over the past half decade. Our presence and reports on YouTube and elsewhere have made this previously little-known UN Commission – and its degradation of the world’s food supply – a matter of intense discussion among health freedom advocates all over the world.
The US is the strongest force, and the biggest bully, in Codex. But the presence of the USA in Codex is not necessarily a positive thing, on at least two levels. On one hand, the US Government, expressed by the FDA, has a stated policy of “HARMonizing” our nutrient freedoms with international restrictions, including restrictions inherent in Codex’s insistence upon treating dietary supplements as though they were industrial toxins, while allowing all sorts of real toxins into the food supply, denigrating natural and organic products. This “HARMonization”, however, is illegal according to several statutes passed by the US Congress.
On the other hand, the presence of the US delegation, with its heavy Big Agra, Big Chema, Big Biotech and Big Biz presence, tilts the Codex process away from natural, local and sustainable food production, leading to global industrialization and degradation of the food supply, mandated under-nutrition and a host of other serious ills, creating massive food borne illnesses: Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke, Diabetes, Obesity and a host of others from which we are dying.
So the US presence may benefit neither the American people or the people of the rest of the world.
What do you think?
Take the Natural Solutions Foundation Survey to Express Your Opinion Here:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/questionnaire.jsp?questionnaire_KEY=1042
Please share this post widely so that others can tell us if they think that the US should get out of Codex.
Natural Solutions Foundation depends on supporter donations to continue our vital work. Make your tax deductible donation now:
https://staging.drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189
Health Freedom IS our First Freedom,
Yours in health and Freedom,
Natural Solutions Foundation Trustees
Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army, Ret.)
President
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Ralph Fucetola, JD
Counsel and Trustee
Health Freedom
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Food Freedom
www.FoodFreedomeJournal.org
Valley of the Moon(TM) Eco Demonstration Project
www.InternationalDecadeofNutrition.org
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
Valley of the Moon(TM) Coffee – Free of Pesticides, Herbicides, Fungicides, GMOs
www.ValleyoftheMoonCoffee.org
www.DrRima.net
Global Alliance |
|||
Global Alliance |
|||
Natural Solutions Foundation
The Voice of Global Health Freedom™
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Does Wall Street “Reform” Threaten DSHEA Products?
As most health freedom advocates know, the two most powerful “consumer protection” Federal agencies, the FDA and the FTC are not friendly toward natural products, including dietary supplements protected by the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA). Before that law, such products were under severe attack, so much so that FTC sought in 1975 to use its rule making power to effectively ban such products. By 1980 the public outcry caused Congress to restrict that power, and then in 1994 DSHEA was adopted, protecting our right to truthful information about nutrition.
Thus when a number of astute “old hands” in the industry said the new Wall Street “reform” * bill had language hidden in it that could threaten natural products with new general rule making power for the FTC to abuse.
We’ve opposed this bill on that basis, with many thousands of messages to Congress demanding protection in the bill for DSHEA products.
See: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=3142
Now along come some suggesting there is no problem here (somewhat the way some “old hands” thought John McCain’s justly maligned and now happily defunct “Dietary Supplement Safety” bill, S.3002 was no threat). We’re told there is no FTC empowerment language. We did our due diligence and researched the actual bill, S.3217. Go to www.Thomas.gov and put in the bill number, open up the .pdf version and search for the name “Federal Trade Commission.”
You’ll find what I found:
I’ve reviewed the 1522 page .pdf file of the version of the bill considered by the US Senate. The terms “Federal Trade Commission” occurs on 26 pages. Five pages discuss FTC authority.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:s3217as.txt.pdf
Page 1375 contains the smoking gun:
“(C) CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN COMMISSION AUTHORITIES. —
Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A) and (B), the Federal Trade Commission shall continue to have authority to enforce, and issue rules with respect to—
(i) the Credit Repair Organizations Act (15 U.S.C. 1679 et seq.);
(ii) section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) * and
(iii) the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (155 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.).”
Section 45 of Title 15 states:
“Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful. ”
Notice how carefully the new law is stated, “continue to have authority to enforce, and issue rules…” — so it will “continue to have authority to enforce…” — notice carefully how it is worded, “…, and issue rules…” Thus “continue” applies to enforcing existing rules, dating from the 1970s or issued under limited laws passed by Congress (as they have done with regard to, for example, direct marketing) while “issue rules” is a new power which relates, tucked in section (ii) to the agency’s general Section 5 authority!
So FTC now has authority to enforce and issue rules with respect to “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce…”
That is general authority to control all interstate commerce without further authorization from Congress!
I therefore conclude that the bill does threaten natural and DSHEA products.
One of my colleagues, Counsel Jim Turner of Swankin and Turner, Washington DC attorneys, puts it this way:
“My understanding is that the FTC was stripped of this authority in 1980 and this is an effort to restore that authority. It has broad implication for example if what I understand is true then this is the authority that FTC used in its effort to ban the words ‘organic, natural and health food’ from all commerce. It is not good if this is happening.”
Please continue to keep the pressure on Congress; we’ve revised the Action Item, telling our representatives that there is still time to get it right, in the conference committee that will shortly consider the bill.
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=3142
We need your help to keep up this fight. Please donate here:
https://staging.drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189
Yours in Liberty,
Ralph Fucetola JD
Natural Solutions Foundation
Trustee and Counsel
———————-
* In this case “reform” means a multi-trillion anti-market bailout and a slap on the wrist…